🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is seeking damages totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a direct response from the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal measures, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that when you do all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."